minor issues that need help

For discussions related to ski/snowboard construction/design methods and techniques.

Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp

Post Reply
newmie
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:46 pm
Location: bozeman,

minor issues that need help

Post by newmie »

so, we pressed pair number two a few weeks ago and had a lot more success than our first pair, but still a few problems.

1. We pressed our skis for 26hours at a declining pressure of 40-25psi overnight. We pulled the skis which immediately lost almost all camber, and about half of the tip and tail rise. I am stumped why this happened, all I can come up with is that it is the epoxy. we used west systems 206A and 205A just like you guys, although the temp was around 40* by morning (the epoxy should cure in 10hrs or so at 32 though? ? ? ?) any ideas?

2. Skis were SUPER SOFT---understandable since we used 4oz glass and hemlock cores (unlaminated)---these were our lower benchmark skis to see what a minimum amount would ski like (min. glass, soft wood, two layers glass per ski, nothing fancy) my question here is this: wil doubling mass of glass double stiffness? (ie two layers of 8oz glass?)

3. BIGGEST PROBLEM! we mounted some alpine bindings (look p 8.0 demo). The toe piece ripped out after one semi-aggressive run in th BC in soft snow, stripped right out of the wood. Some ski shops told me ALL skis use metal sheets for the binding to screw into, i dont believe them, what do you recommend? (thicker/more layers of glass under-foot, perhaps some glass matte?)

4. Bases were concave and convex all over!, I took them to a ski shop, and in order to get them flat, they took off so much base that it was non-existent in some areas---what cause such a thing? (epoxy buildup, glass crinkles, MDF ribs?????)


Thanks for any help
davide
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Tsukuba, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
Contact:

Post by davide »

2. 4oz glass seems too few. Usaully people uses 20/30 oz./sq.yd.
If you double the glass it will much more than twice stiffer. If I remeber well the stiffness is proportional to the cube (maybe only the square) of the glass layer.

3. I do not think you need metal sheet: a thick strong wood core would keep the screws.

4. Base can be slightly concave or convex, but just few tens of mm. Is the core smooth? Did you lay down the glass flat? Check maybe the press.


I would suggest you do some trails, laminating a wood slab (maybe 10cm wide, 50cm long) with glass and a piece of base, just to get more experience. Then you can use these pieces to make flex tests, so you can learn how much glass you need to get a certain stiffness.
kelvin
Site Admin
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: Jackson Hole

Post by kelvin »

1.) In our unheated press, the skis will probably lose half the camber. If you want 10mm of camber in the final ski, your mold should be about 20mm. I'm assuming you meant 105 resin and 206 hardner. The 206 is there slow hardner and they recommend 60f minimum, the 205 hardner is faster and works to 40f. Even at those temps 206 takes about 9-12 hours to become solid and 1 -4 days to reach full strength. If you are working in cold temps you should use 205.

2.) More fiberglass would probably stiffen it up, but a thicker core would stiffen it up more. Another problem could be your epoxy not fully cured.

3.) Hemlock is a softwood and isn't very strong. It is pretty similar in strength to pine. You probably want to use a hardwood that is dense and strong, like maple or birch, especially where the bindings attach. Not all skis have metal and I think a nice chunk of hardwood would hold a screw better than a thin sheet of metal or extra fiberglass.

4.) Check your mold, core, and layup to make sure everything is smooth to begin with. It is possible that your mold or press is not stiff enough and is deforming with pressure.

Send some pics if you can. thanks.
-kelvin
Greg
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 11:41 am
Location: Sweden but home is NW Washington

Post by Greg »

I mount alpine bindings straight into the skis, without a metal binding sheet, and I have only had one screw pull out (I drilled the hole oversized though, so it was to be expected), I have not mounted with softwoods though (just maple, ash, and mahogony). One trick you can do is to load up the mounting holes with glue before you screw the screws in. This really helps keep everything together. Other than that, all of my bindings have stayed on really tight, and I am extremely tough on my skis.

What I have found though is that the easiest way to delam a ski is to spend time in the terrain park. The hard landings on the jumps really can do a number on your tips and their lamination (I think rivets should solve this problem though).
o0norton0o
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:07 am
Location: Seattle

Post by o0norton0o »

its the hemlock that has no stiffness or ability to hold a screw. I come from the northeast usa originally, where the best "hardwoods" from. (yes, I know the northwest has nice softwood lumber species) hemlock is considered useless back east, it not good for woodwork, doesn't burn worth a damn, and will find any pipe underground carrying any water and bust into it with very powerful roots. I assume you are looking for a medium stiff ski from what I have read here so far. most ring porous species are very stiff, ash, oak, hickory,... etc. From what I have read here so far these would be suited for old style double camber type ski's unless you were going to make a thin ski and take camber power out of it by thinning the ski height. I see here the ski makers talking about poplar and maple mostly and I would think that would make a good core strong enough to not tear a binding out and stiff enough to hold some camber too.
est sularis oth mithas
Post Reply