Balsa core fattys, first try!

For discussions related to ski/snowboard construction/design methods and techniques.

Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp

fa
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:58 am

Post by fa »

i favor spruce as i have plenty of low quality 3x5cm drying in my balcony
strong and smelly
hard to find clean planks without any nodes though
once i left a spruce kiteboard in the car under full summer sun for a day and the next morning a teardrop of wood resin appeared on top of the top skin just above a damned node
how the hell it was squeezed through the fg and the epoxy, i guess it must have boiled in there
gran is the scandinavic tree? whats its density like?
OAC
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:34 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by OAC »

ca 430 kg/m³, same as poplar
I have a log of Cedar that I'm going to try...anyday now. It's 450 kg/m³ knots free! (almost)
fa
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:58 am

Post by fa »

thanks, 430 is a tad heavier than the ones i have
the dried poplar i am getting is quite lighter, sometimes below 350kg/m2
i guess it is a different specie or cheaper wood from fast grown trees
OAC
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:34 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by OAC »

Yeah, I just took the numbers from a table. But it gives you hint.
User avatar
White Thrash Wednesday
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:42 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by White Thrash Wednesday »

But, Swedish Spruce="Gran" have a Youngs modulus of up to 16.5 Gpa with a density of ~ 400 kg/m^3... Seriously stiff wood when compared to its weight. Stiffer than UD glass fiber which is about 40 GPa (volume fraction 0.5) with a weight of 1800-2000 kg/m^3.

Mother Nature is a clever engineer with many years of working experience ;-)
Making skiing Green.
User avatar
Brazen
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:26 am
Location: San Bernardino, CA
Contact:

Post by Brazen »

yeah, hard to argue with natures in vivo experience haha. OAC: One of the most pleasant experiences I've had boardmaking was someone that wanted a core from hand-hewn Galapagos cedar boards. The shop smelled like heaven for weeks.
"86% of the time it works 100% of the time".
carlito
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:53 pm

Answering Questions

Post by carlito »

@ Kstrom

First question: The balsa is strong enough. Stringers are unnecessary. Keep in mind that I am referring to end grain balsa. You also have to remember that the bindings are a big stress riser. Some sort of core rienforcement will be needed to avoid this. Same goes for voids/dry core. These are guaranteed failures. Avoid at all costs.

This leads to the third question: Getting the correct fiber/resin ratio into facings and then applying to the core. I would not try this. Especially with balsa. Threee reasons. First, its really hard to get the "correct" fiber/resin ratio with a hand lay-up, try to do the best you can, and its probably workable. Remember the old adage: Too much resin is heavy, not enough will break. Your choice. Second the balsa will soak up a surprising amount of resin. I will assume here that you were talking about having the core dry, and putting the wet laminates onto it. You really need to wet the core out to make sure. This problem becomes especially acute if you use any heating. The elevated temperatures will cause the resin's viscosity to drop (get much thinner) allowing it to soak even more effectively into the core. Finally, resin control is always an issue. Once the vacuum is on/press is on it becomes a sort of black box. It's really hard to tell what is going on in there. As the resin heats up and gets thinner, and as the pressure comes on it gets really easy to squeeze out/bleed out too much resin. This can be hard to see, even when the skis (board) are done. It seems really nice and light though. Problem come later, high pressure spots (the end of the edge contact zones and end of tips/tails, or interfaces with tip/tail fillers or other core rienforcements) may delaminate pretty easily. Edges seem to pull out really easily. topsheets delam. I believe that this is probably the biggest quality issue most people will have once they deal with the "getting a usable pair of skis out of this" stage is over. My two cents says avoid resin dry layups. You can wet the materials out somewhere else and apply onto the press/cassette, that's fine, just not to anything dry.

As to the carbon. a layer of 6 oz cloth (0/90 cut at 45, spun 45 to get fibers at +-45) only gives you 3 oz in each torsional direction. 22oz triax and 19 oz triax (the industry benchmark) provide 6 oz of glass in either direction. Even in a pow ski you need some sort of torsional stiffness (how much is a whole other can of worms), so half the weight to get somewhere around the same stiffness is a pretty good trade. It definitely would not be too torsionally stiff. The best stuff I have made yet uses 6 oz of carbon in each torsional axis. The grip is nice, and it doesn't affect the lengthwise stiffness at all.

Hope this helps.

Ps. im new to the forum thing and don't really know the etiquette involved. Are these posts too long/rambling?

Have fun,

Carlito.

PPs. Just snowed 45 cm in 36 hours. -10 C. Pow skis working great. still snowing
User avatar
MontuckyMadman
Posts: 2395
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by MontuckyMadman »

191 Fats are just awesome. 116 underfoot, same profile, same flex in the tip but beefier in the tails. 4.8lbs.
http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/show ... p?t=211200

These are aspen btw.
I bet a 12 oz carbon roving and...
User avatar
White Thrash Wednesday
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:42 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by White Thrash Wednesday »

@Madman
Is the weight per ski or pair? Didn´t find out that in the link. Maybe I missed it...?
@Carlito

I thought your reply was really good and informative. Keep up the good work! Your reply sort of sums up my experience of working with balsa, vacuum and applied heat for curing :-)

/Johan
Making skiing Green.
User avatar
MontuckyMadman
Posts: 2395
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by MontuckyMadman »

Well I don't bet but on this I would bet $50USD that I don't have, that it is the weight per pair.

edit: Nope im stupid per ski.
Guess Im out 50$
K.Ström
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:45 am
Location: Dalarna, Sweden

Post by K.Ström »

@White Thrash Wednesday
Yepp, full test, feeling and bending report of both the cores and the ski building is coming up as soon as i get the stuff.

@Carlito
Realy nice post! This will spare me a lot of time, money and testing!
User avatar
White Thrash Wednesday
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:42 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by White Thrash Wednesday »

@MontuckyMadman
I suggest you give the money to charity(=buy material to build yourself a cool pair of skis) ;-)

By the way, did you use veneer as top sheet on your skis, or did you have a regular plastic top-sheet on top of the veener? A lot of "top" in that sentance...
/Johan
Making skiing Green.
User avatar
White Thrash Wednesday
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:42 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by White Thrash Wednesday »

The other day I got hold of some Paulownia from boardbuildingsupply.eu. I only weighed one board but the density was approx. 300-330 kg/m^3 so it was not as light weight as I expected. Info on Paulownia often states that it is somewhere in the 200-250 kg/m^3 region.
I´m looking at end grain balsa too which is 155kg/m^3 (ProBalsa from DIABgroup.com). One concern with the end grain balsa sheets is that it has virtually no stiffness in bending, so if the facesheet fail, the ski will snap. But it will be light ;-)
/Johan
Making skiing Green.
havocdru
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:29 pm

Post by havocdru »

I've been using Paulowia in the place of Balsa in Surfboard building. It has a really high strength to weight ratio and now is farmed in the states(South Carolina) so the cost is way better. Plus it can be bought in raw form and you're able to pick tighter grains from different parts. We use them in Tow-Board surfboards(50 foot + wave range) and have had know problem with breakage. And we are only glassing with 8 oz bottom and 8oz top. The wood provides a good flex ratio as well. I never thought about using it in snowboard/ski building. May give it a try as I think we still have some. Hummmm!? keep ya posted.
doughboyshredder
Posts: 1354
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:37 pm

Post by doughboyshredder »

MontuckyMadman wrote:
191 Fats are just awesome. 116 underfoot, same profile, same flex in the tip but beefier in the tails. 4.8lbs.
http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/show ... p?t=211200

These are aspen btw.
I bet a 12 oz carbon roving and...
not roving
Post Reply