Alpine Skis Materials?

For discussions related to the type of materials to build skis/snowboards and where to get them.

Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp

Post Reply
BigG
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:41 pm

Alpine Skis Materials?

Post by BigG »

Hi

I've been mailing with little Kam about his use of Titanal in his skis and I was also wondering how I could make a stiff alpine ski.

What do you think about the use of titanal and would you use small titanal tubes to stiffen up some alpine skis. I'm planning to start building my own skis and would like to know which materials I would use to have a very stiff cross ski. I'm 203cm and weighs about 110kg. Now you know why I would need a stiff ski.

I like the Voelkl Supersport Superspeed or Allstar Skis. They are incredibly stiff and have a nice cut. They have hooked shaped raised parts at the left and right side. I think the bindings are set on a plate which is adapted to the raised sides.

Which materials do you think they are using?

Cheers,

Geoff
User avatar
endre
Posts: 413
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:51 am
Location: norway
Contact:

Post by endre »

you don't need stiff materials to make a stiff ski. but a strong ski needs stronger materials. Metal in skis makes the skis bend before they brake, personally I don't like that. (some claim it's safer: when you'r out in nowhere and you break/bend your ski, it's better with a bent one) On the other hand metal in skis makes them heavier, more damp and strange-but-seems-to-be-true: more torsional stiff. About the tubes I don't really know, they are definately made to dampen the ski, and would have a negative effect on the torsional stiffness.. difficult to make in the garage too.

but if your goal is just to make a stiff ski (and I uderstad why you would need one!) I would just make the core 2mm. thicker.(that would make a huge difference in stiffness)
BigG
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:41 pm

Post by BigG »

The little bit thicker core will be probably the best option.

I have however another issue. What about the binding plate? Binding plate is a sort of plate which is part of the ski (under the toplayers) and in which the bindings are screwed. Where can we find some of them or how can we make them?

Geoff
User avatar
endre
Posts: 413
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:51 am
Location: norway
Contact:

Post by endre »

what do you mean? The alu sheet to prevent binding pullout or just steel inserts? I have put a piece of aluminum in the mid section of the skis to prevent pullout, worked fine. If not you can just use inserts, probably the strongest:
http://www.skibuilders.com/howto/skicon/inserts.shtml
collin
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:19 pm

Post by collin »

I've been thinking about this lately as well, mostly because I've been lusting after the Volkl Mantras. [If anybody knows of a shop that demos them in colorado or newhampshire/vermont let me know...]

There has to be an advantage to using a lot of metal in a ski, otherwise nobody would do it right? Some things that might be true:

1- Is it lighter for the stiffness? Holding the Mantras, they seem fairly light for their size and stiffness, comparable to other skis with similar dimensions B4's/Seth Pistols/Pocket Rockets/etc which are all softer. I don't know of another fat ski that's as stiff. Then again I haven't weighed them.

2- Are they more torsionally rigid? Not having actually skied on them I can't say for sure, but from holding them and from all the mag reviews/forum posts seem to say they're rediculous. That's not to say you couldn't make a glass ski that's as torsionally rigid.

3- Is it cheaper to manufacure them? For Volkl, since they make skis in Germany [right?], labor costs are a lot higher than for a ski made in China. I'd guess it's a lot quicker to throw a stamped piece of metal on each side of the core. But a lot more work if you're building them at home.

4- More durable? With a full layer of metal on each side of the core it seems like you could sit there and hit you skis with a hammer and not really hurt them.

5- Unique flex properties? Well this has to be true, doesn't it? A ski with a lot of metal is going to be "less damp" or have "pop" or be "more active", which are kinda the same thing. I don't know if you could do this with glass, carbon yes which means more $$$, like the DP/DB skis which I've also been lusting after.

6- History? With the Mantras being the replacement for the Explosives do they use metal just to keep it a similar ski?

As for the Volkls you mention I think it's just a shaped wood core. Well, additional wood on top of a regular core is what it looks like here. It doesn't say they have any metal, but I think the Supersport Superspeeds have a layer of carbon between the two wood parts.

I like your idea about using tubing though. What size were you thinking? Going from the thin wall/large diameter use of aluminum in bike frames maybe 2cm with a 2mm wall?

As a related topic, I've got an old pair of GS skis I got out of the trash that I want to disect. As allways it's easier to destroy than it is to create. I blame entropy. They obviously have a full layer of metal between the core and topsheet, maybe there's one below the core. Any bets on where the second sheet is if it's there? Above or below the edge tabs? I'm also curious if there's any composites in them and if they did anything besides roughing up the metal to get a good bond. I'll post pics when I get around to it.
BigG
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:41 pm

Post by BigG »

Endre,

I would like to ask you what you are using a core for your skis or what would be the best core material and structure for my skis. You know what I need ;-) .

Geoff
Greg
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 11:41 am
Location: Sweden but home is NW Washington

Post by Greg »

I just built a pair of skis with thick maple cores, and they are really stiff, but they are quite heavy. I also just made a ski using a 12mm thick ash core, and it is pretty much the stiffest ski I have ever seen (it is also 130mm wide in the center).

Also, when I broke a salomon AK Rocket last year, the first part to break was the metal topsheet, followed by the foam core, then the wood core broke last. The ski was held together by the base. I would bet that just by using p-tex as a topsheet (which is a pretty strong material in tension, or at least flexible) and a hardwood core (like ash) with fiberglass tips and tails, you could get a really solid ski.
davide
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Tsukuba, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
Contact:

Post by davide »

If I have well understood, the stiffness is proportional to the 3rd power of the thickness of the wood core: for example, increasing the wood-core thickness from 12mm to 14mm, the stiffness will be 50% more.
It is also proportional to the width of the ski, so the stiffness of 130mm wide ski is twice than a 65mm wide.
I made a reverse camber, 170mm wide ski (14mm thick core), and even if I put very few glass, it came out crazy stiff. I will machine the core to make it thinner.


With a wood-core 4/6mm thick at the tip and tail and 20/24mm thick in the centre, no glass reinforcement is needed anymore. The drawback is that such a thick core is more fragile, i.e. it breaks when subjected to a small bending strain.
User avatar
endre
Posts: 413
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:51 am
Location: norway
Contact:

Post by endre »

I use Ash. not only because it has the stongest strength/wheight ratio of the wood I can get aroung here, but also because it is quite easy to get. Skis have been made from ash for thousands of years. A very cheep and good alternative is to use pine. If the wheight issue is a big deal it is an interesting fact that a lighter ski has a thicker core (!) this is because as you increase the core thickness a certain amount, you can reduce the wheight of reinforcement (glass, titanal, etc.) more than the added core wheight. When you do this, the ski gets more "brittle" and will not bend as far as the thinner, more reinforced and heavier ski before it breaks.
BigG
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:41 pm

Post by BigG »

Endre,

You're in Europe, so I'm asking you if you are talking about American Ash as we call it here in Belgium? I think it's the most available ash over here but I can be wrong about that. Is it multiplexed ash board or 1 piece?

What about maple? Some of the persons here are speaking about it. Is there a website where we can find some reference material about weight and strength of the different sorts of wood?
collin
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:19 pm

Post by collin »

davide wrote:If I have well understood, the stiffness is proportional to the 3rd power of the thickness of the wood core: for example, increasing the wood-core thickness from 12mm to 14mm, the stiffness will be 50% more.
It is also proportional to the width of the ski, so the stiffness of 130mm wide ski is twice than a 65mm wide.
Ok, the second part makes sense to me, but the first doesn't at all. Why wouldn't the stiffness of a material be linear with thickness?

Let's say you increase core thickness to get core X% stiffer, is it X% stiffer torsionally? I would guess not since the wood in the core has fibers running only in one direction and twisting the ski would create a lot of shear forces parallel to the grain. Right?

Is this why metal makes sense in a fat stiff ski? Since metal is non-directional you get stiffness in the two directions for less weight compared to a thick core and more glass. Looking at how thin the Mantras are I'd guess that the core is maybe 30% thinner than a comparable ski. That combined with not having to use any glass [maybe] might make a lighter ski for the stiffness.

Does this make sense to anyone else?
Alex
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Munich (Germany)

Post by Alex »

We use triaxial fibers for the outer layer of the ski +-45 an 0 degrees. The outer fiber of the structure takes almost all the load for tension and pressure. 0 degree while bending and 45 degree for torsion. There is not much left for the wood then shear forces.

Making the core thicker increases the section modulus. When i've got time i will write a little explanation (it's a little difficult for me because i only no the german terms for mechanics). Maybe you can take a look into a mechanics book to find out....
User avatar
endre
Posts: 413
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:51 am
Location: norway
Contact:

Post by endre »

I have used both the american (white ash) and green ash, they have quite simular qualities. with maple though, you have to look out, because sugar maple, which is used for cores, skateboards, floors, etc. is not at all the same maple that grows here in europe, which is much lighter and quite soft. So be shure it's the canadian/hard/sugar maple, and not soft/european maple. actually ash is lighter compared to the hard maple. (and about the same strength) so I use that. (and maple is harder to get here.)
BigG
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:41 pm

Post by BigG »

I've been looking for wood some time now but without success. I don't know where I have to look and what I have to look for?

Some are selling pressed ash plates but that's not the thing I need I presume.

I'm living in Belgium and the Netherlands. Is there someone who knows how I would be able to find what I need?

Geoff
Post Reply