GS Race ski

For discussions related to ski/snowboard construction/design methods and techniques.

Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp

dorabito
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:06 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

GS Race ski

Post by dorabito »

Hey everyone!
During my summer vacations I am thinking of building a pair of skis.
This is what I want:
- A GS (Giant Slalom) ski according to men´s FIS rules for Giant Slalom
- Max stability on long radius turns
- Max grib on hard, iced and transformed snow
- High speed

Here is my project:

Tip: 103mm.
Waist: 69mm.
Tail: 88mm.
Camber:15 mm.
Lenght 185cm.
Tail to Waist: 67cm.
Estimated Radius: 28m.

UPDATE: NEW LAYUP (probably the final one)

CLEAR TOPSHEET
750g/m2 FIBERGLASS
OBECHE/OAK CORE, ABS SIDEWALLS and TIP/TAIL SPACERS
750g/m2 FIBERGLASS
340 g/m2CARBON UD-TAPE 25mm. (twice)
VDS RUBBER FOIL
STELL EDGES and P-TEX BASE

Image

This is the core lamination:

sidewall(or tip and tail spacers) /obeche/oak/oak/obeche/obeche/obeche/oak/oak/obeche/sidewall
(or tip and tail spacers)


The heights of the core:

Tip: 2mm.
Waist: 12mm.
Tail: 3mm.





This was the firts layup. It was changed due to advices from people from this forum (thank you guys) and experiments.

I´m (was) thinking on building it as this:

TOP SHEET
TRIAXIAL FIBERGLASS
BI-DENSITY WOOD CORE, ABS SIDEWALLS and TIP/TAIL SPACERS
TRIAXIAL FIBERGLASS
TRIAXIAL FIBERGLASS
CARBON FIBER
RUBBER (anti vibration and edges bonding)
P-TEX BASE and STELL EDGES

Image

Tip Height: 2mm.
Waist Height: 10mm.
Tail Height: 3mm.


So guys, what do you think about it? Should I change carbon fiber to fiberglass, kevlar or whatever? Is it a good idea to put rubber there?
Will it be stiff and resistant?
I am open to any suggestions, so if you have one please tell me
Last edited by dorabito on Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:30 am, edited 12 times in total.
"The only one who can say you can't do something is you, and sometimes you shouldn't hear yourself"
Unknown
OAC
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:34 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by OAC »

What I understand is that the carbon fiber should be under the core.
OnDeck
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:02 am

Post by OnDeck »

Never tried it perosnally, but i understand that dfferent weight glasses (or even a total lack of glass on one side) will affect the camber, because of different rates of contraction during curing.
dorabito
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:06 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post by dorabito »

OAC wrote:What I understand is that the carbon fiber should be under the core.
Skis should have at least one layer of fiber under the core and one above. This is what I read:
http://www.skibuilders.com/howto/skicon ... ites.shtml
Last edited by dorabito on Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The only one who can say you can't do something is you, and sometimes you shouldn't hear yourself"
Unknown
OAC
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:34 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by OAC »

I meant if you are using carbon fiber you should have it under core. Of course there should be fiber above the core but should be regular triax or biax glass. But if you want a stiff race ski you can have carbon fiber above aswell.
The theory is about tension(under) and contraction(above). There are differences between carbon and glass in this matter. But how much, I'm not able to tell you. That's up to you to experiment with!... ;)

Cheers
Good luck
leifkj
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:58 am

Post by leifkj »

I've been thinking of doing a race ski at some point, and one thing I've noticed is that most commercial race skis have two layers of aluminum, one above, one below the core.
dorabito
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:06 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

aluminium

Post by dorabito »

leifkj wrote:I've been thinking of doing a race ski at some point, and one thing I've noticed is that most commercial race skis have two layers of aluminum, one above, one below the core.
It should be aluminum paper or hard aluminum?
Last edited by dorabito on Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The only one who can say you can't do something is you, and sometimes you shouldn't hear yourself"
Unknown
User avatar
MontuckyMadman
Posts: 2395
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by MontuckyMadman »

your user name makes me think of doritos

Image
User avatar
chrismp
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 9:00 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Post by chrismp »

MontuckyMadman wrote:your user name makes me think of doritos

Image
you should put some of those in your cores and give it super space-techy name ;) sth like dorito-ultra-lightning-bolt-special-weapon-makesyouridiculouslyfast-tech
skidesmond
Posts: 2337
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Western Mass, USA
Contact:

Post by skidesmond »

What's bi-density wood core? Are you using 2 types of wood? Rubber is a good idea. It will be a stiff ski alright. But it also depends on the thickness of your wood core and the type of wood(s) being used.

Are you building them to actually race? Is it beer-league racing, NASTAR, ....?

The tail sounds pretty narrow as does the waist. Check out what the big manufactures are using for designs/shapes to get a good idea (Fischer, Atomic, Volkl, ....). You can give the ski a little more shape but still keep a high turning radius if you want.

There's some good info in the forum on the uses of Kevlar and CF. Check it out.
OAC
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:34 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by OAC »

I was loitering in one of the bike/ski store in my neighbourhood and they had some Atomic GS race skis there. And I was surprised to see how narrow they were! And stiff as h**l! Looked like my old ones from the 70's... :D
skidesmond
Posts: 2337
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Western Mass, USA
Contact:

Post by skidesmond »

OAC wrote:I was loitering in one of the bike/ski store in my neighbourhood and they had some Atomic GS race skis there. And I was surprised to see how narrow they were! And stiff as h**l! Looked like my old ones from the 70's... :D
Yeah I was at the ATOMIC website last night looking at one of the GS skis, 99.5/67.5/85.5. That's a skinny ski by todays standards.
jono
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:26 am
Location: denver

Post by jono »

Why did FIS go from 21m to 27m for men's GS skis?

Dorabito,
I made a pair of skis last year that had 34oz triaxial glass on the bottom of the core and 20oz triaxial glass on top. These skis have a thick core profile that makes them stiff. The asymmetrical distribution of fiberglass (greater weight of the bottom glass) has given these skis less tip height and greater camber. They ski like SG skis and the extra glass makes them damp. There was no need for rubber to damp vibration in these skis.
Unless you are talking about VDS rubber foil (on top of your edges), I would skip rubber on your first pair and focus on keeping the skis simple. Get a racing plate with rubber in it for vibration absorption.
I would also say that if you want damp skis you'll have more luck with fiberglass than you would with carbon fiber + rubber.

Also check out: viewtopic.php?t=835

Good luck!!
chaka
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:26 am
Location: Alto Campoo/Valle de Benasque

Post by chaka »

I have already built a pair of GS skis using 3 layers of 720gr triax glass under core and three above. I also added two carbon ud tapes under and other two above. I used a very hard oak core, not too thick. I think that using a hard wood makes the difference in this kind of skis.
They were room temperature cured but the symmetrical layup has kept the camber after 2 seasons.

One more advice... if you are only going 182 long I would keep the radius about 21 meters. If you want more radius I would build something a little longer... maybe 190 cms.
RIDE WITH PRIDE
dorabito
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:06 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post by dorabito »

skidesmond wrote:What's bi-density wood core? Are you using 2 types of wood? Rubber is a good idea. It will be a stiff ski alright. But it also depends on the thickness of your wood core and the type of wood(s) being used.

Are you building them to actually race? Is it beer-league racing, NASTAR, ....?

The tail sounds pretty narrow as does the waist. Check out what the big manufactures are using for designs/shapes to get a good idea (Fischer, Atomic, Volkl, ....). You can give the ski a little more shape but still keep a high turning radius if you want.

There's some good info in the forum on the uses of Kevlar and CF. Check it out.
My bi-density wood core is made of poplar (flexible and light) and maple (stiff and resistant) in this construction:
Sidewall, poplar, 2 maple, 3 poplar, 2 maple, poplar, Sidewall

These skis will be for beer-league racing, and the shape was adapted from an Atomic Race GS D2 WC/EC from the season 2010-11
Last edited by dorabito on Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The only one who can say you can't do something is you, and sometimes you shouldn't hear yourself"
Unknown
Post Reply